Wheeler’s EPA Keeps Brain-Damaging Chlorpyrifos in Food https://t.co/PiaxaTPD7N
— Moze Jacobs (@MozeMJacobs) February 22, 2019
EPA scientists: The toxic chemicals our agency won't regulate are definitely in our drinking water https://t.co/yJEZUcKO7o
— Mother Jones (@MotherJones) February 26, 2019
The nation’s biggest coal-burning power companies paid a top lobbying firm millions of dollars to fight a wide range of Obama-era environmental rules — shortly before one of the firm’s partners became Trump’s top air pollution regulator https://t.co/DfLBEOJeQv
— POLITICO (@politico) February 24, 2019
“Scientists just became irrelevant at the agency,” said Elizabeth Southerland, who resigned in 2017 after 33 years at the EPA, “because we were not allowed in the room where the decisions were being made” https://t.co/lJ2JeXiU6C
— New York Magazine (@NYMag) February 21, 2019
this scientist Ed Calabrese, who's behind the "little bit of pollution is good for you" argument taking hold at the EPA, was the center of a big story I did in the fall, which was getting almost no attention at the time https://t.co/4KUudnRB2h
— Rebecca Leber (@rebleber) February 19, 2019
The fight is a preview of the kind of battles that the advocates of a Green New Deal will have as they take on entrenched incumbent industries who have been spending heavily, for years, to generate government favors they are loathe to see disappear. https://t.co/u8K1oQcak3
— The Intercept (@theintercept) February 19, 2019
EPA returns to bullying tactics against news orgs: https://t.co/ekIsXUDqAv
— ErikWemple (@ErikWemple) February 5, 2019
Sad! 