I agree – I am shocked by the disgusting comments I see on tweets.
Very much feeling this @maggieNYT column. Twitter is so often just an outrage machine. I'm not sure what, if anything, can fix that. https://t.co/s0hx4GInCE
— Abby D. Phillip (@abbydphillip) July 20, 2018
Part of Maggie Haberman’s experiences on Twitter is that readers rightly or wrongly project their perceptions of the Trump White House’s relationship with nation’s most influential newspaper on her.
That she’s a woman online adds another toxic layer. https://t.co/kQdhSyqu22
— Adam Klasfeld (@KlasfeldReports) July 21, 2018
At (great) risk of triggering same, many Twitter attacks on @maggieNYT were sexist—far more than equally prominent male colleagues—or blaming her for things she reported on, or for somebody else dubbing her “the Trump whisperer” or for failings in NYT coverage she was not part of
— Clara Jeffery (@ClaraJeffery) July 20, 2018
Why is @MaggieNYT limiting her tweeting? Because Twitter is an "anger video game," she says. "I actually liked Twitter because I liked engaging with readers in a different way… but that started to have more net negatives than net positives." More Sunday at 11 a.m. ET! pic.twitter.com/G0kWQIY17R
— Reliable Sources (@ReliableSources) July 21, 2018
Sad! 