The Supreme Court upended environmental law at the worst possible moment, Richard Lazarus writes in a guest opinion. https://t.co/RgWONja2zm
— Washington Post Opinions (@PostOpinions) July 1, 2022
The last of the Supreme Court's blockbuster rulings, curtailing the ability of the EPA to regulate greenhouse gases, "has implications far beyond the vital issue of climate change," @paulwaldman1 writes. "And the conservative justices aren’t even done." https://t.co/HFLfHqkgQX
— Washington Post Opinions (@PostOpinions) July 1, 2022
The EPA had a way to address climate change without Congress passing new legislation — until the Supreme Court weighed in today. https://t.co/pgQiHoqfW2
— Philip Bump (@pbump) July 1, 2022
The Supreme Court's three liberal justices dissented in the ruling limiting the EPA's ability to restrict power plant emissions, writing that the decision strips the agency of "the power to respond to the most pressing environmental challenge of our time." https://t.co/lUcpgRUGD8 pic.twitter.com/6h8PcN4vxN
— The New York Times (@nytimes) June 30, 2022
Justice Kagan: "The Court appoints itself—instead of Congress or the expert agency—the decision- maker on climate policy. I cannot think of many things more frightening. Respectfully, I dissent." https://t.co/L3sGnqB8Zg
— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) June 30, 2022
Sad! 