Trump tariffs costing Americans $1.4 billion a month, have "no impact" on foreign exporters https://t.co/O5AO6StAje
— Salon (@Salon) March 26, 2019
So it looks like Trump may have gotten his aluminum prices mixed up. According to metals ace @JoeDeaux Trump appears to have quoted global (LME) prices. The picture for US domestic buyers is, er, a little different… https://t.co/QS1czt379b
— Shawn Donnan (@sdonnan) March 8, 2019
‘A punch in the gut’: Farmers hit by tariffs see crops swept away by flood. Great to work w the insightful @anniegowen on this story. https://t.co/1hLGDQP4Wg
— FrancesSteadSellers (@FrancesSSellers) March 23, 2019
"To put a $1.2 billion loss into perspective, every person in the state of Nebraska would need to contribute $632 to cover that volume of lost dollars [from Trump's tariffs]."
— Cheri Jacobus (@CheriJacobus) February 17, 2019
– Jay Rempe, Nebraska Farm Bureau, senior economist.@highbrow_nobrow https://t.co/rEOOhn6gMg
High % https://t.co/yeVWjK9rHN
— Rick Wilson (@TheRickWilson) February 23, 2019
China trade talks are pushed back as tariffs continue to bite https://t.co/bTBFyf1Ubv via @nytimes
— Ana Swanson (@AnaSwanson) March 17, 2019
It's been a full year since President Donald Trump claimed his trade war would be "good and easy to win." Now, the data strongly suggest otherwise.https://t.co/zRlFeWzcvG
— Eric Boehm (@EricBoehm87) March 5, 2019
“The concern is that a deal could end up seeing only a short-term increase in Chinese purchases of U.S. agricultural and energy products.” https://t.co/cBa6sf6MUK
— Daniel W. Drezner (@dandrezner) February 24, 2019
See? Wasn't all that worth wrecking the rules-based trading system? https://t.co/l0WUJG0KCe
— Paul Blustein (@PaulBlustein) February 23, 2019
New #FactChecker –> Trump’s repeated claim that China is paying ‘billions’ in tariffs to the Treasury https://t.co/MwZD8dVPOO
— Glenn Kessler (@GlennKesslerWP) February 22, 2019
