The Kansas Supreme Court said "yup, racist gerrymandering is totes cool and super constitutional" https://t.co/7s3nl4bDPd
— Dustin (@ks_hare) May 18, 2022
BREAKING: The Kansas Supreme Court upholds the state's congressional redistricting map, issuing a landmark decision in Kansas that says gerrymandering is not a violation of the state constitution. Will have more soon. #ksleg
— Dylan Lysen (@DylanLysen) May 18, 2022
#NEW: The KS Supreme Court has approved Kansas's state legislative maps.
— The Redistrict Network (@RedistrictNet) May 18, 2022
Oral argument was conducted in the Kansas gerrymandering case Rivera v. Schwab.
— National Redistricting Foundation (@RedistrictFdn) May 17, 2022
KS voters & @loud_light, with the support of the NRF, effectively argued that the enacted congressional map is a partisan gerrymander & dilutes the voting power of minorities. https://t.co/UEZfj0JBRj pic.twitter.com/7V7zyx3xYB
KS Supreme Court is wrestling with the question of whether the guarantees in the state constitution's Bill of Rights preclude partisan gerrymandering in congressional districts and, if it does, how improper partisan gerrymandering is defined. #ksleg https://t.co/s7y5jQopWC
— John Hanna (@APjdhanna) May 16, 2022
The Kansas decision, the text of it, is fucking strange. pic.twitter.com/DSrmT5EaEK
— Ryan Brune (@BruneElections) April 25, 2022
4R-0D…whew, they really tried it https://t.co/PH0Uq7Awuk
— Democracy is in Trouble 💚💕 (@ProfTolson) April 25, 2022
