Statement on Washington Post’s refusal to endorse presidential candidate. pic.twitter.com/r8jrMPW5GR

— Carl Bernstein (@carlbernstein) October 26, 2024

The abortion-beat reporter for the Washington Post. Her own mother canceled https://t.co/KtToiKTpUX

— Will Bunch (@Will_Bunch) October 26, 2024

Inside @washingtonpost's newsroom, which operates separately from the opinion department, "people who are thinking about the prospect of covering a second Trump presidency are concerned that the owner won't have our backs," a staffer tells me

— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) October 26, 2024

To the dozens and dozens of readers who have reached out over the last 24 hours I am very sad to see you go but am touched more than I can say by your words and your loyalty. If I did not respond personally, it is because the volume has gotten out of hand. But I have read each…

— Jen "We aren't going back " Rubin 🥥🌴 (@JRubinBlogger) October 26, 2024

I sometimes share my #readermail on this site.
A different genre has arisen in the past 24 hours: a deluge of sad farewells from loyal readers. A few examples here. pic.twitter.com/Lk2Qe8np2T

— Catherine Rampell (@crampell) October 26, 2024

Current list of WaPo opinion writers who have protested the owner's cowardly decision not to endorse. If this were actually a decision "of principle," they could have announced it two years ago. Instead of following the James Comey model of election-year timing.

Admiration to:… pic.twitter.com/0Zs8xETvRK

— James Fallows (@JamesFallows) October 26, 2024

A friend who works for #WaPo marketing dept says there's a #WaPoMeltDown in their business unit following the news as digital subscriptions cancellations have hit 60k barely 8 hrs after decision not to endorse. Cancellation rate is unprecedented and we're barely 24 hours into it. pic.twitter.com/9qefA3TNKI

— Carlos (@TheMayaka) October 25, 2024

Scoop: Washington Post editor at large Robert Kagan confirms to me that he resigned from the Post following today's decision not to endorse in the presidential race. https://t.co/as86U0hYqh

— Max Tani (@maxwelltani) October 25, 2024

The Washington Post's decision not to endorse in the presidential race is "an abandonment of the fundamental editorial convictions of the newspaper that we love." A statement from me and other longtime Post columnists: https://t.co/WmYamYmIEb

— Dana Milbank (@Milbank) October 25, 2024

Big credibility hit. Fist bump to @washingtonpost reporters who are fearlessly writing about @JeffBezos' 11th hour endorsement change, as w/ any powerful institution that needs to be held to account. @RoigFranzia Laura Wagner @MerylKornfield
Thank you for letting me share my… pic.twitter.com/lah20gg78A

— Carol Leonnig (@CarolLeonnig) October 26, 2024

I'd hope that the @nytimes newsroom is studying these headlines RIGHT NOW to see how absolutely off the mark they are. This toxic mix of sanewashing trump while denigrating Harris for simply being a good politician is really, really dangerous and just plain wrong. https://t.co/qetajKyYzz

— Jennifer Schulze (@NewsJennifer) October 10, 2024

I wrote for the @nytimes for more than 20 years and never saw headline lunacy like this (of course I was there before the company disbanded its copy desk). See below… https://t.co/laU3xEuRqU

— Andrew Revkin 🌎 ✍🏼 🪕 ☮️ (@Revkin) October 10, 2024

Large, shameful factual error: “The Snake” is not an anti-immigrant poem. It’s a 1963 song by a Black civil-rights activist, Oscar Brown. Trump reads its lyrics as an anti-immigration parable, but they have nothing whatsoever to do with immigration. @IanPrasad, cc @Rogene. pic.twitter.com/gcIXjS9RdX

— Typos of the New York Times (@nyttypos) October 10, 2024

"Fascination" is the usual euphemism and the headline is designed to be inoffensive to Trump (also as usual), this time by failing to name racism as the reason for his preoccupation with the genes of migrants. https://t.co/5n1XcSCSzY

— Ruth Ben-Ghiat (@ruthbenghiat) October 10, 2024

If the NYT still had a public editor, there would be a way to get an explanation of this headline, this framing, this story itself. https://t.co/LsRxy6oDaz

— James Fallows (@JamesFallows) October 10, 2024

This is how the conventions of mainstream journalism skew the political discourse. @Nytimes puts on its front page news of the latest poll (w/ a result within the margin of error) & puts the story on Harris’ plan to expand Medicare for home health care to help millions on p. A12. pic.twitter.com/NBAwaag2Gj

— David Corn (@DavidCornDC) October 9, 2024

Here’s the New York Times describing a lying fascist lawmaker as “proud and combative.” The Times is doing storytelling instead of truth telling. pic.twitter.com/jdFWsFqRpZ

— Mark Jacob (@MarkJacob16) October 5, 2024

Why don't you tweet about the living presidents who did wish Carter a happy birthday? The media is obsessed with Trump.

— Harris Levy (@HarrisL585) October 3, 2024

Is the New York Times unaware that the Trump Administration repealed the overtime rule passed by the Obama Administration or did they just refuse to include it as a major flip flop? pic.twitter.com/ImruXD5cfd

— Neera Tanden🌻 (@neeratanden) September 13, 2024

"Filtered through the lens of Trump" is a great observation. The Times treats him as the main character of American politics. It's a deliberate choice, and a lot of what's baffling or infuriating about their political coverage is downstream from it. https://t.co/HTKAAPMdFv

— Christopher Ingraham🦗 (@_cingraham) September 12, 2024

OMFG, the word Cheney doesn't appear on the home or front page of the Times today. A grand coalition in American democracy is forming. The #BrokenTimes is ignoring this momentous story–as well as good news for Harris. This is not news judgment. My view:https://t.co/sug1O7btvx

— Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis (@jeffjarvis) September 7, 2024

Still no sign at the NYT that a candidate for President admitted that his core election plank would be "bloody."

Seems like it should merit blaring headlines? pic.twitter.com/6W5IQOSMFa

— emptywheel (mark to market) (@emptywheel) September 8, 2024

NY Times in a news report still won't call him 1) a liar 2) deranged 3) too old. Instead 1) midleading 2) unfocused 3) vigorous. https://t.co/P4sinNUKuW

— Greg Mitchell (@GregMitch) September 7, 2024

The media helps Trump by using wimpy
“false claims” instead of calling them lies .

— Harris Levy (@HarrisL585) September 9, 2024

Tragic–and I say that as a historian of authoritarianism familiar with the costs of such silences. https://t.co/1l9Pq6m8VD

— Ruth Ben-Ghiat (@ruthbenghiat) September 9, 2024

Still no sign at NYT or WaPo that they at all care that one of the candidates to be President said his primary election promise — mass deportation — would be "bloody." pic.twitter.com/HOofIYUDTt

— emptywheel (oil check) (@emptywheel) September 8, 2024

Not a single word about Trump's epic, explicit, written threat to investigate & lock up his opponents under the false pretext of election cheating. Readers of the NYT simply are not being told what the stakes of the election are. pic.twitter.com/7swtgn9vZu

— Joseph O'Neill (@JosephONeillx) September 8, 2024

The New York Times’ Michael M. Grynbaum writes that moderators Dana Bash and Jake Tapper “won praise for their even-keeled style” in the previous debate, and he links to a story by Michael M. Grynbaum in which the only person praising their performance was Michael M. Grynbaum. pic.twitter.com/yWX8paUbrm

— Mark Jacob (@MarkJacob16) September 8, 2024

The key thing about Afghanistan is that there has been 100 times more scrutiny of the details of the withdrawal than of the prior 20 years of military failure, and any future president will learn the lesson that it’s a mistake to ever end any deployment for any reason.

— Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) September 9, 2024

“Amplifies False Claim” is the Timesian Timid Translation of the very scary word “Lies.” pic.twitter.com/EHg95vEK15

— Mark Jacob (@MarkJacob16) September 9, 2024

Do you refer to Trump as “Donald”?

— Harris Levy (@HarrisL585) September 1, 2024

I stopped watching about 2 years ago. No regrets.

— Harris Levy (@HarrisL585) July 3, 2024

.@CNN's "new" strategy continues to fail, the ratings continue to fall and now they are alienating their most loyal viewers, including me.

"CNN was the third most-watched news network in total viewers in primetime and total day…"

— Don Winslow (@donwinslow) July 2, 2024

We've been saying it for weeks… @CNN, once the most trusted name in news, gave up its journalistic integrity & credibility by platforming a whiny orange criminal. @ChrisLichtCNN threw away their hard-earned reputation for short-term profits and ratings. We hope it was worth it. pic.twitter.com/xpG5bET8rN

— The Lincoln Project (@ProjectLincoln) June 2, 2023

Oh, hey, @CNN . Heard your ratings are at an all-time low. Matches your integrity!

Here's an idea: how about just objectively reporting facts?

How about doing actual journalism and not spinning?

How about not giving established liars and GOP propagandists air time?

— Portia ♍️ McGonagal (@PortiaMcGonagal) July 2, 2024

Opinion by Jennifer Rubin: The widespread media condemnation of a shoddy front-page Wall Street Journal article about President Biden “slipping” with age suggests we may have reached a journalistic inflection point. https://t.co/fUcljiTqt1

— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) June 9, 2024

It is rare for @Poynter to weigh in on how bad a news story was, but the @WSJ hit piece on Biden was that bad. https://t.co/H86p4eq0g4

— Dan Froomkin (PressWatchers.org) (@froomkin) June 6, 2024

Wow: A spokesperson for The Journal told me that the Rupert Murdoch-owned newspaper, which is under the stewardship of newish editor Emma Tucker, "stands by its reporting." If Tucker is comfortable with such shoddy journalism, it is worrisome.
https://t.co/Ve8GOaEPql

— Jennifer "Trump Convicted Felon" Rubin 🇺🇦🇮🇱 (@JRubinBlogger) June 6, 2024

Biden’s team seethes over another age piece — and sours on The Journal https://t.co/WmqHJR11Js

— POLITICO (@politico) June 5, 2024

I was there & went on record to @WSJ w/ opposite recollection that's not quoted in the story. Bottom line: Anonymous Republican sources didn't raise these issues in real time, day after, or week after. Trying to do so now reeks of political hit job.https://t.co/PBNdBu6gYr

— Senator Jack Reed (@SenJackReed) June 5, 2024

The White House is firing back against a WSJ report that Biden "appears slower" and "has both good moments and bad ones" in meetings with congressional leaders. https://t.co/kY3GNvjbKq

— Axios (@axios) June 5, 2024

The President just spoke to approx 1,000 mostly black voters in Philly about the massive stakes in this election. @MSNBC @CNN & others did not show it.

Instead, more coverage about a trial that impacts one person: Trump.

Then they'll ask, why isn't your message getting out?

— TJ Ducklo (@TDucklo) May 29, 2024

The Washington Post now pic.twitter.com/anirRA83Hz

— Harris Levy (@HarrisL585) May 30, 2024

This perfectly incapsulates the disconnect between the ivory tower/beltway know-it-alls and voters. Donald Trump’s trials don’t impact real people. They impact Donald Trump. His horrific, draconian, dangerous policies impact voters. Cover those. Stop covering polls & process. https://t.co/QmeHcV6b71

— TJ Ducklo (@TDucklo) May 30, 2024