Law firms are wrong to cave in to Trump

They have offered to do free work for the Trump administration. Since Trump has no respect for laws, what will they do when he asks them to defend something illegal? Trump is a bigot so what if he asks them to defend a racist action? They’ll regret this. All lawyers should have stood together against the bully. I commend the ones that have fought back.

More please. More.www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025…

Wajahat Ali (@wajali.bsky.social) 2025-04-05T22:00:59.973Z

More than 500 law firms rally behind embattled peers, declaring that Trump’s crackdown on the legal industry poses “a grave threat to our system of constitutional governance and to the rule of law itself.” But none of the top 20 firms join. http://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/04/b…

Peter Baker (@peterbakernyt.bsky.social) 2025-04-04T23:37:32.435Z

Kudos to the law firm Arnold & Porter. It is the largest law firm that is not either itself target by Trump or representing a firm targeted by Trump to sign the amicus brief in support of Perkins Coie. Put another way, A&P has no direct financial interest in the outcome of the case and yet signed.

Marc Elias (@marcelias.bsky.social) 2025-04-04T19:17:48.508Z

OK patriots, "each fat-cat firm that caves in response to Trump’s demands makes next capitulation that much easier, & puts the whole industry more firmly under Trump’s thumb." Paul, Weiss and Skadden: Capitulating Cowards of the Legal Profession newrepublic.com/article/1935… via @newrepublic.com

Harry Litman (@harrylitman.bsky.social) 2025-04-03T16:39:55.489Z

Perkins Coie asked a federal judge in D.C. to reject President Trump’s executive order sanctioning it over its hiring practices and legal work for Democrat Hillary Clinton, calling the measure a threat to the firm and the legal profession more broadly reut.rs/4jdV5HA 1/5

Reuters Legal (@legal.reuters.com) 2025-04-03T16:45:37.802Z

I’m proud that my own Cato Institute is among the groups signing a cross-ideological amicus brief in the Perkins Coie case. Our country’s liberty is in dire peril if a would-be strongman can destroy a law firm for having stood up to him personally or the federal government he heads.

Walter Olson (@walterolson.bsky.social) 2025-04-03T02:55:50.749Z

I think I'm a realist.I didn't think I lived in a world where Kamala husband's biglaw firm and Katyal's biglaw firm both surrender to Trump in a single day.Golly.

Matthew Stiegler (@matthewstiegler.bsky.social) 2025-04-02T18:38:41.642Z

Another Big Law firm shamefully capitulates to Trump. This time Milbank. It may make more money, but the stain of this shame will be a part of this firm forever. Every partner and associate now has a choice to make. History is watching.

Marc Elias (@marcelias.bsky.social) 2025-04-02T18:50:57.541Z

The Rifkinds’ two-page letter, which was obtained by The New York Times, echoes reactions that have reverberated through the legal community in the wake of the firm’s deal with Mr. Trump. Critics have accused the firm of capitulating to intimidation, rather than fighting the order in court.

Jennie Coughlin (@jenniecoughlin.bsky.social) 2025-04-02T16:08:08.002Z

DOGE efforts to rewrite Social Security software are dangerous

DOGE effort to rewrite Social Security code could have catastrophic consequences, experts warn

DOGE’s new plan to overhaul the Social Security Administration is doomed to fail

Sounds like the computer systems at Social Security Admin are starting to get kinda glitchy the more DOGE fiddles talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/situa…

Josh Marshall (@joshtpm.bsky.social) 2025-04-03T20:19:11.263Z

Social Security tech staff cuts raise concerns amid system failures

Great signs from anti-Trump rallies

Just got to the Mall and saw this sign, which no one is going to top. #HandsOff2025

George Conway 👊🇺🇸🔥 (@gtconway.bsky.social) 2025-04-05T16:34:54.288Z

DOGE attack on IRS data

SCOOP: DOGE is hosting a “hackathon” in DC next week with the goal of building one “mega API” for accessing all IRS data. Palantir has been brought up as a potential partner. http://www.wired.com/story/doge-h…

makena kelly (@makenakelly.bsky.social) 2025-04-05T16:06:16.737Z

A while back I mentioned I helped to build a government AI tool. DOGE "deleted" (fired) my whole org (@alt18f.bsky.social) and took the tool to become their "AI-first strategy."But what is the strategy? What are they actually planning to do?I’m trying to piece it together. Here’s what I think 🧵

John Skiles Skinner (@skiles.bsky.social) 2025-04-04T02:13:03.151Z

Postscript: I want to address this questionDidn't DOGE already steal all this data? IRS and SSA data? So am I just describing something that's already happened?No.It's true that DOGE has seized access to a bunch of data, and they *may have* copied it, although that's mostly unconfirmed.

John Skiles Skinner (@skiles.bsky.social) 2025-04-04T06:11:31.071Z

My thoughts on ‘A Complete Unknown’

I thought ‘A Complete Unknown’ which is about Bob Dylan’s life from 1961-1965 was excellent. Timothee Chalamet is outstanding as Dylan and does a fine job singing and playing guitar as well as acting. The rest of the cast is excellent, too. It’s especially hard to portray living and recent figures when we know what they sound like but this cast carries it off. It’s much harder than, for example, playing George Washington since we don’t know what he sounded like and there are no photographs of him.

It’s very impressive that they didn’t whitewash Dylan’s behavior. There are times he behaves badly. The film also gives insight into how difficult it is to be famous.

I am a big Dylan fan and have been (most of the time) for 60 years,

Dylan and Bob Neuwirth play “Railroad Bill” in the studio (jn what I assume is 1965). Like other old songs like “Delia” and “Stagger Lee”, “Railroad Bill is based on a real person. Dylan didn’t record it until the Self Portrait sessions in1970 and it wasn’t released until 2013. I listened to it today for the first time and thought it was great.

I also like Dave Alvin’s 2000 version:

Tom Wilson, shown in the booth when Dylan is recording, also produced artists such as The Mothers of Invention, Simon and Garfunkel, and the Velvet Underground.

I was a little disoriented when songs were performed out of the order in which they were released on records. Maybe they were actually written in the order in the film. This is not a documentary and the creators have the right to artistic license to film the story their way. The audience member shouting “Judas” and Dylan saying “Play It Loud” actually happened in 1966 at a show in England.

There is a fine documentary on Dylan’s performances at the Newport Folk Festival from 1963-65 titled The Other Side of the Mirror. It was released in 2007. The documentary Dont Look Back covers his 1965 tour of England. The tour is now shown in the new film but something he got in England was mentioned.

The part about Al Kooper playing organ on “Like A Rolling Stone” even though he was not an experienced organ player seems like something they would make up but it really happened in a way generally like it is shown in the film.

Dylan’s early albums are solo with just his voice and guitar. I don’t think they would have been made that way less than 10 years later. Look at the recordings of John Prine, Steve Goodman and Jim Croce. The singer is accompanied by a full band, I saw all of them in the early 1970s. Prine and Goodman played solo and Croce was accompanied by another acoustic guitarist. Dylan going electric probably influenced having these artists recording with a band.

At the end, there is text about Dylan playing at the Guthrie Tribute Concert on January 20, 1968. He was accompanied by the Band and they did three songs – “I Ain’t Got No Home”, “Grand Coulee Dam”, and “Dear Mrs. Roosevelt”. The performances are great – loud rock and roll. There are recordings but the sound quality is only fair. The three songs are on YouTube and there is a box set of the two tribute concerts. Unlike in 1965, the audience was very enthusiastic.

More posts on Trump’s use of antisemitism to attack people

Don’t be fooled. Trump is not an anti-antisemite.

In @nytopinion.nytimes.com “I find no comfort in the Trump administration’s embrace of my people, on college campuses or elsewhere," the first Jewish president of Wesleyan, Michael Roth, writes. "Jew hatred is real, but today’s anti-antisemitism isn’t a legitimate effort to fight it.”

The New York Times (@nytimes.com) 2025-04-07T18:03:56.332Z

The Trump administration uses "anti-semitism" as a cudgel while at the same time practicing the very same: http://www.military.com/daily-news/2…

Ellen 🇨🇦🇺🇸 (@voxindie.bsky.social) 2025-04-04T16:23:36.300Z

"A video of plainclothes immigration agents surprising and arresting a Turkish graduate student at Tufts University on the streets of Somerville, Mass., had particularly disturbing resonance for some in the Jewish community" by @jdavidgoodman.bsky.social http://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/02/u…

Dana Rubinstein (@danarubinsteinbsky.bsky.social) 2025-04-03T16:14:44.424Z

This—what Trump is doing now in trying to destroy American universities, research, and free speech while blaming it on pretend offense to the Jews is certainly the most profoundly antisemitic act I’ve seen from US government in my lifetime.

Amanda Katz (@katzish.bsky.social) 2025-04-01T02:21:12.406Z

I don’t doubt that some of my co-religionists have experienced antisemitism. Sometimes aggressively so.But it’s use as a cudgel to destroy institutions essential to our country has absolutely nothing to do with that.

Josh Chafetz (@joshchafetz.bsky.social) 2025-04-01T01:53:35.234Z

"Purported allyship being used in ways that ultimately may undermine Jews, mirror what some Asian Americans expressed as conservatives were using their communities to argue against — and do away with — race-conscious admissions on college campuses." http://www.msnbc.com/top-stories/…

Joel S. (@joelhs.bsky.social) 2025-04-01T00:11:47.970Z

"Donald Trump and his allies have been using 'anti-Semitism' as a pretext to advance a radical agenda that has nothing to do with Jews at all—and that most American Jews do not support," @yair-rosenberg.bsky.social writes:

The Atlantic (@theatlantic.com) 2025-04-05T01:45:05Z

Could you keep your job if you made mistakes 20% of the time?

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. spoke about cuts to his agency, saying that they "are not affecting science," and that of the personnel that were cut, "20% of those are going to have to be reinstalled" due to "mistakes."

NBC News (@nbcnews.com) 2025-04-04T16:01:17Z

I don't anyone (except Trump cabinet members) could keep their job if they made mistakes 20% of the time.

Harris Levy (@harrislevy.bsky.social) 2025-04-04T17:54:56.071Z